|
 |
|
>>>Return, Terminate,
Withdraw and Reject Processing <<< |
Abate Tax is not a Law Firm |
5.8.7 Return, Terminate, Withdraw and
Reject Processing
5.8.7.1
(11-15-2004)
Overview
- Offers that
are not recommended for acceptance will
be closed by return, rejection,
withdrawal or termination. This chapter
defines the types of dispositions other
than acceptance and describes the
procedures for completing each type of
closure.
5.8.7.2
(11-15-2004)
Returns
- An offer can
be returned as either a Not Processable
Return or a Processable Return. It is
important to note the distinction as the
statute is not suspended, nor is the
taxpayer required to pay the $150
Application fee, for a Not Processable
Return.
5.8.7.2.1
(11-15-2004)
Not Processable Returns
- Not
processable returns are those
returns made when upon receipt, an
offer meets one or more of the "Not
Processable" criteria listed in IRM
5.8.3.4.1.
5.8.7.2.1.1 (11-15-2004)
Closing an Offer as a Not
Processable Return
- See
IRM 5.8.3.9 for procedures.
5.8.7.2.2
(11-15-2004)
Processable Returns
-
Processable returns include all
returns made after the offer has
been determined to be processable.
- During the
offer investigation there are a
number of situations that may result
in a processable offer being
returned to a taxpayer. A
processable return will result in a
suspension of the collection statute
for the period of time that the
offer was considered processable and
will result in the Service keeping
the $150 application fee. An offer
closed as a return does not receive
appeal rights, however different
levels of approval exist for some
return situations.
- The
following chart lists the reasons a
processable offer may be returned
and who can authorize the return.
5.8.7.2.2.1 (11-15-2004)
Return for Inadequate
Estimated or Insufficient
Withholding Tax Payments
- A
processable offer may be
returned when the investigation
reveals the taxpayer does not
have sufficient estimated tax
paid or income tax withheld to
cover the current year estimated
tax due.
Example:
While investigating
an offer in
compromise on July
15, 2004 you learn
that the taxpayer
has an extension
until August 15,
2004 to file their
2003 Form 1040. You
must determine
whether the taxpayer
has sufficient
income tax withheld
or estimated taxes
paid for the entire
2003 tax year as
well as for the
first two quarters
of the 2004 tax
year.
The
requirement to have adequate
estimated tax paid prior to
consideration of an offer
applies to corporate as well as
individual taxpayers.
- Prior
to returning an offer for this
reason the following actions
must be taken:
-
A
determination must be
made if the taxpayer has
earned sufficient
taxable income to
require estimated
payments or income tax
withholding for the
year(s) in question and
a calculation must be
made of the amount of
tax that should have
been paid in estimated
tax payments to date (or
withheld) on the income
earned.
-
Contact with the
taxpayer or
representative must be
made explaining the
calculated
non-compliance. A
request for payment of
an estimated tax payment
must be made to bring
the taxpayer current. A
reasonable deadline for
responding must be given
along with a warning
that the offer will be
returned if the payment
is not received by the
deadline set.
-
All of the above must be
clearly documented in
the case history on
AOIC.
- A
return for failing to make
required estimated tax payments
or insufficient withheld tax
requires approval of a Group
Manager in the field or a Unit
Manager in COIC.
5.8.7.2.2.2 (11-15-2004)
Return for Failure to
Provide Information
- An
offer may be returned at any
time during processing if the
taxpayer fails to provide
information necessary to
determine whether it should be
accepted.
- Prior
to returning an offer for this
reason the following actions
must be taken:
-
A
request for the needed
information must be made
by phone, in person or
by letter. A reasonable
deadline for responding
must be given along with
a warning that the offer
will be returned if the
information is not
received by the
deadline.
-
The above information
must be clearly
documented in the case
history.
- The
return letter must be signed by
the Group Manager in the field
or a Unit Manager in COIC.
5.8.7.2.2.3 (11-15-2004)
Closing an Offer as a
Processable Return
-
Processable returns do not
require preparation of the Form
1271.
- The
following actions should be
taken to close a case as a
processable return:
-
Verify that the AOIC
record reflects a "Y" in
the Processable status
field.
-
Remove any tax periods
listed on the MFT screen
that are NOT listed on
the Form 656. This
reverses the Transaction
Code (TC) 480 on these
periods and helps to
ensure that inaccurate
CSEDs for such periods
are not reflected.
Note:
This step is not
required if the
offer was submitted
on the 2004 revision
of Form 656 that
includes provision
"q" which states
that all liabilities
assessed against the
taxpayer are covered
by the offer.
-
Generate the AOIC Return
Letter for the signature
of the appropriate
delegated official,
listing the reason(s)
the offer is no longer
processable.
-
Generate the Power of
Attorney (POA) letter
for any authorized
representative. If a
disclosure issue exists,
use the appropriate
paragraph to indicate
this in the Return
Letter, and do not send
a copy to the
representative.
-
Stamp the Form 656
"RETURN" in red. Cross
out the IRS received
date(s) with a red "X" .
-
Document the history
indicating the reason(s)
the offer is no longer
processable and with any
other pertinent
information regarding
the case.
-
Attach the offer to the
taxpayer's letter and
submit the letter(s) for
approval and required
signature.
-
Keep a copy of the offer
and the closing
letter(s), the
Collection Information
Statement (CIS), all
supporting
documentation, and all
internal documentation
secured in connection
with the investigation
in the case file. Purge
the file of any
duplicate IDRS prints or
other data not related
to the offer.
-
Close the case on AOIC
as a "return" once the
letter is signed.
5.8.7.3
(11-15-2004)
Return Reconsideration
- This section
does not apply to the return of offers
deemed not processable. It also does not
apply to processable offers returned for
any of the following reason codes:
- P
(filed bankruptcy after offer
submission)
- Q
(non-compliance after offer
submission)
- R, V,
W (solely to delay submissions)
- S
(collection is in jeopardy)
- X
(other investigations are
pending that may effect …)
- Y
(original assessment fully
abated)
- Situations may
arise when the reconsideration of a
returned offer would best serve the
interests of both the Service and the
taxpayer. In most cases, an additional
application fee would not be required.
Upon receipt of a return letter
taxpayers may telephone to object to the
return of an offer. Below are the
criteria for possible reconsideration.
5.8.7.3.1
(11-15-2004)
Criteria
- Generally,
the taxpayer or their representative
must contact the Service to raise
objections and justify the failure
to provide the requested items
within 30 calendar days from the
date of the return letter (unless
the condition that caused the
failure to supply the substantiation
continued for a prolonged period).
- Acceptable
criterion for potential return
reconsideration are:
-
The information was sent
timely but it was not
associated with the case.
-
Serious illness/injury
prevented the taxpayer from
submitting the information
timely.
Note:
Serious illness/injury
does not apply to the
representative, since
the taxpayer controlling
the information receives
a copy of the
combo/additional
information letter.
-
There was a death in the
taxpayer's immediate family
that prevented timely
mailing of the information.
-
The taxpayer suffered a
disaster, such as a fire or
flood, that prevented timely
mailing of the information.
Note:
Disasters effecting the
representative would not
apply since the taxpayer
controlling the
information receives a
copy of the
combo/additional
information letter.
-
The failure to perfect by
providing a required
additional Form 656 and
application fee, when the
original Form 656 included
both joint and separate
liabilities or
individual/joint and
corporation or partnership
liabilities.
-
The taxpayer submitted a
Form 656-A certification
instead of paying the $150
fee, and then provides proof
that an incorrect conclusion
was made.
-
The failure to make
estimated payments and then
the taxpayer provides proof
that estimated or withheld
taxes were not due.
5.8.7.3.2
(11-15-2004)
Conditions
- Before
reconsidering the closed offer the
following conditions must be met:
-
The total offer amount must
be equal to the amount
offered on the returned
Form(s) 656;
-
The taxpayer or their
representative must be able
to provide the missing,
required documentation or
fees within 30 calendar days
of the telephonic
communication of the
reconsideration approval;
- The
following would not be acceptable
reasons for return reconsideration:
-
"Unavailable absence" of
either the taxpayer or
representative, since they
control the timing of the
filing of the offer;
-
Representatives’ "filing
season" activity, since they
control the timing of the
filing of the offer.
5.8.7.3.3
(11-15-2004)
Approval Authority for Return
Reconsideration
- Approval
to reconsider a returned,
processable offer(s) will be
obtained from COIC Department
Managers or Area office Group
Managers before requesting the
taxpayer/representative to send any
missing documentation or fees. This
authority may not be re-delegated.
The manager will indicate approval
or denial of the request by making a
history entry on AOIC (not ICS).
5.8.7.3.4
(11-15-2004)
Reconsideration Procedures
- If the
employee receiving a telephone
request from a
taxpayer/representative for
reconsideration determines the
request does
not have merit, based
upon the acceptable criteria
outlined in IRM 5.8.7.3.1, the
employee will advise the taxpayer or
their representative and annotate
the closed offer record history on
AOIC.
Note:
Any
request by the taxpayer or
representative to speak with the
employee's manager should be
honored.
- If the
employee receiving a telephone
request for reconsideration
determines that the request
does
have merit based upon the acceptable
criteria outlined in IRM 5.8.7.3.1,
the employee will:
-
Contact the taxpayer or
their representative and
request additional
information to support the
reconsideration be sent
within 10 calendar days.
Note:
Fax is the preferred
method of receipt.
-
Annotate the closed offer
record history on AOIC.
- If the
taxpayer/representative does not
provide the requested information,
annotate the closed offer AOIC
history that there will be no
reconsideration.
- If the
taxpayer/representative provides the
requested information, the
recommending employee will:
-
Annotate the closed offer
history on AOIC and request
the reconsideration by
making a history entry on
the closed offer record AOIC
(not ICS), describing the
taxpayer's claim and/or
supporting verification and
why the reconsideration
request is justified.
-
Submit the closed offer case
file, along with any
verification submitted by
the taxpayer to support the
reconsideration request,
through management channels
to the approving official.
- Denial of
the Reconsideration— If the
approving official denies the
reconsideration request, the
employee assigned the case should
clearly communicate via telephone to
the taxpayer (representative, if
applicable) that the request for
reconsideration was denied and that
the matter is closed. The employee
will then document the AOIC history
of the closed offer regarding that
communication.
- Approval
of the Reconsideration— If the
approving official agrees that a
returned offer should be
reconsidered, the employee assigned
the case will telephone the taxpayer
(representative, if applicable) and
advise that we will reconsider the
offer. The taxpayer will be advised
that he/she must be able to provide
us any missing, required
information/substantiation/ Forms
656/fees within 30 calendar days of
that telephonic communication of the
reconsideration approval.
Field offices should fax a copy of
the front page of the original Form
656, including the offer number and
received date of the requested
information/substantiation to the
respective COIC sites. This will
enable the COIC sites to create the
new offer record.
The offer information will not be
reloaded to AOIC and worked until
receipt of any required
information/substantiation/Forms
656/fees. If the taxpayer fails to
submit the promised items, document
the AOIC history of the closed offer
to that effect and take no further
action.
- Reloading
the Reconsideration Offer — For
purposes of an approved return
reconsideration do not reopen the
closed offer record on AOIC.
Instead, create a new AOIC offer
record by reloading the same AOIC
data as the returned offer, except
for "IRS Rcvd Dt" , "AO Rcvd Dt" and
"Pend Dt" fields which will contain
the date that we receive any missing
information/ substantiation/Forms
656/fees, as applicable.Associate
the documents from the closed offer
with the new, reloaded offer folder.
Enter an AOIC history notation in
the closed offer record to indicate
that those documents were refiled
with the reloaded offer. Place a
hard copy of the AOIC history in the
closed offer folder.
-
Reloading Offers With a
Previously Submitted
Application Fee
If
the taxpayer already paid
the application fee with the
original returned offer, for
the new AOIC offer record
enter "N" in the "Fee Due"
field, "ME" in the "Waiver
Criteria" field and the
number of the original,
returned offer in the
"Master Offer #" field of
AOIC Application Fee screen.
-
Reloading Offers With a
Corrected Form 656-A, Income
Certification
If
the taxpayer submitted a
corrected Form 656-A, income
certification with the
returned offer, enter the
following for the new AOIC
offer record "N" in the "Fee
Due" field and " LI" in the
"Waiver Criteria" field of
AOIC Application Fee screen.
-
Additional Form(s)
656/Application Fee(s)
Received as Condition for
Reconsideration
Some reconsideration
situations may involve an
original offer that included
either joint and individual
tax liabilities, or
joint/individual and
corporation or partnership
liabilities on one Form 656.
The offer may have been
returned because the
taxpayers failed to perfect
it by submitting additional
Form(s) 656 and the
applicable application fee
for each. Since the
taxpayers met the fee
requirement for the original
returned Form 656, they must
submit and meet the fee
requirement for each
additional Form 656 before
the original offer will be
reloaded under return
reconsideration procedures.
Therefore, both the
"Amended/Revised" and "
Related to" offers that were
previously provided with the
Combo letter, must be loaded
to AOIC, but not until the
application fee is paid for
the "Related to" offer along
with any additional
substantiation that was
required.
5.8.7.4
(11-15-2004)
Withdrawal
- Taxpayers may
withdraw their offers at any time after
the offers have been submitted. A
withdrawal must never be solicited
merely to avoid a complete investigation
or deny taxpayers access to Appeals.
- When an offer
cannot be recommended for acceptance the
offer investigator should give the
taxpayer an opportunity to withdraw the
offer and at the same time inform the
taxpayer that withdrawing the offer
forfeits their appeal rights. The case
history or correspondence must document
that the taxpayer was informed of these
rights.
- A withdrawal
request may be made orally, by fax or in
writing. The Letter 3504(SC/CG) is
available for taxpayers to request a
withdrawal. Service employees should
encourage taxpayers to provide the
withdrawal in writing, but if a taxpayer
or authorized representative provides a
clear statement, either in writing or
orally, indicating a wish to withdraw
the offer, the offer may be closed as a
withdrawal. Receipt of a withdrawal
request must be clearly documented in
the case file indicating how the request
was received.
- If a request
for a withdrawal is made by a Service
employee the taxpayer should be asked
to:
-
Provide a request in writing
clearly indicating a desire to
withdraw the offer.
-
Include a statement indicating
that it is understood that
rights to appeal are forfeited
by a withdrawal.
-
Include a statement indicating
how any deposit made (if any)
should be disposed of (i.e.
should it be refunded or applied
to the tax debt).
- Sign
and date the request.
5.8.7.4.1
(11-15-2004)
Closing an Offer as a Withdrawal
- Offers
closed as a withdrawal do not
require preparation of Form 1271.
- The
effective date of the withdrawal
will depend on the method of receipt
of the request to withdraw. The
following chart shows the correct
date to use as the withdrawal date:
- The
following actions should be taken to
close an offer as a withdrawal:
-
Remove any tax periods
listed on the MFT screen
that are NOT listed on the
Form 656. This reverses the
Transaction Code (TC) 480 on
these periods and helps to
ensure that inaccurate CSEDs
for such periods are not
reflected.
-
Generate the AOIC Withdrawal
Letter for the signature of
the authorized delegated
employee. Use the chart
above to determine the
correct date to use as the
effective date of the
withdrawal.
-
Generate the Power of
Attorney (POA) letter for
any authorized
representative.
-
Document the history
indicating the date and
method of receipt of the
withdrawal request.
-
Submit the file for approval
and signature of the
letter(s).
-
Close the case on AOIC as
"withdrawn" after approval.
If there is a deposit and
the taxpayer has requested
that the deposit be applied
to the tax, input "A" and
mail a copy of the
taxpayer's written request
for application of the funds
to the appropriate MOIC
Unit. If there is a deposit
and the taxpayer has asked
for a refund or provided no
instructions for disposition
input "R" to refund the
deposit.
-
Keep a copy of the letter(s)
with the closed offer file.
Note:
This
step is not required if the
offer was submitted on the 2004
revision of Form 656 that
includes provision "q" , which
states that all liabilities
assessed against the taxpayer
are covered by the offer
5.8.7.5
(11-15-2004)
Termination of Consideration
- Consideration
of an offer must be terminated upon the
death of a single proponent. See IRM
5.8.10.4 for instructions on actions to
take prior to termination when advised
that one party to a joint offer has
died.
5.8.7.5.1
(11-15-2004)
Closing an Offer as a
Termination
- Offers
closed as terminations do not
require preparation of the Form
1271.
- The
following actions should be taken to
close an offer as a Termination:
-
Remove any tax periods
listed on the MFT screen
that are NOT listed on the
Form 656. This reverses the
Transaction Code (TC) 480 on
these periods and helps to
ensure that inaccurate CSEDs
for such periods are not
reflected.
-
Generate the AOIC
Termination Letter for the
signature of the authorized
delegated employee.
-
Generate a copy of the
letter for any authorized
representative.
-
Document the history
indicating the date of death
and how notification was
received.
-
Request input of TC 540 to
IDRS if the exact date of
death is confirmed.
-
Submit the package for
approval and signature of
the letter(s).
-
Close the case on AOIC as a
"Termination" after
approval.
-
Keep a copy of the letter(s)
with the closed offer file.
Note:
This
step is not required if the
offer was submitted on the 2004
revision of Form 656 that
includes provision "q" , which
states that all liabilities
assessed against the taxpayer
are covered by the offer
5.8.7.6
(11-15-2004)
Rejection
- When the facts
of the case do not support acceptance
and the taxpayer will not agree to an
alternative resolution of the
delinquency and withdraw the offer, the
taxpayer should be informed that the
offer will be recommended for rejection.
- When the offer
is rejected the taxpayer will be
notified in writing and the letter will
explain how to exercise their appeal
rights. Information received from the
taxpayer in response to a conversation
or letter must be considered before
proceeding with the rejection.
- Offers based
on Doubt as to Liability (DATL) are
generally rejected because the tax is
believed to be correct as assessed.
- Offers based
on Doubt as to Collectibility (DATC) are
most commonly rejected on the basis that
more can be collected than was offered.
In all cases, other than those processed
under "Screen for Obvious Full Pay" ,
the taxpayer should be informed prior to
the issuance of the rejection letter
that an acceptance cannot be
recommended. The computation of
reasonable collection potential (RCP)
should be explained, a copy of the
financial analysis provided, and the
taxpayer should be given an opportunity
to submit any additional financial
information. If no conversation is held
with the taxpayer to convey this
information, Letters 3498 (SC/CG) and
3499 SC/CG) may be used for this
purpose.
- An offer
rejection may also be based on a
determination that acceptance of the
specific offer at hand is not in the
"best interest of the government" , per
policy statement P-5-100. Rejections
under this provision should not be
routine and should be fully supported by
the facts outlined in the rejection
narrative. Offers rejected under this
section require the review and approval
of the second level manager; that is,
Territory Manager for the field or
Department Manager for COIC. Examples of
situations that may warrant rejection as
not being in the "best interest of the
government" include:
- Recent
compliance satisfies offer
processability criteria, however
the taxpayer has an egregious
history of past non-compliance
and our analysis of his current
finances reveals that it will be
highly unlikely the taxpayer
will be able to remain in
compliance during the offer
terms.
- An
in-business taxpayer
compromising employment taxes,
where financial analysis
indicates the business does not
have the ability to fund the
offer, remain current with
future tax obligations, and meet
the business' normal operating
expenses.
- Any
offer involving deferred payment
where financial analysis
indicates the taxpayer cannot
fund the offer.
- The
taxpayer is the primary
responsible party on a related
entity, i.e. corporation,
partnership, etc., that is not
in compliance with its filing
and paying requirements.
- The
offer is from an ongoing
business that appears to be
insolvent, and it appears that
the government's position would
be better protected through a
formal insolvency proceeding.
5.8.7.6.1
(11-15-2004)
Public Policy Rejection
- Policy
Statement P-5-89 establishes that
offers may be rejected on the basis
of public policy if acceptance might
in any way be detrimental to the
interests of fair tax
administration, even though it is
shown conclusively that the amount
offered is greater than could be
collected by any other means, if no
Effective Tax Administration (ETA)
issues exist.
Note:
This
section should not be confused
with IRM 5.8.11.2.2 under
Effective Tax Administration
(ETA) offers.
- A decision
to reject an offer for public policy
reason(s) should be based on the
fact that public reaction to the
acceptance of the offer could be so
negative as to diminish future
voluntary compliance by the general
public.
Decisions to reject offers for this
reason should be rare.
Example:
Below
are some examples of situations
that may warrant rejection based
on a public policy decision.
-
The taxpayer has openly
encouraged others to refuse
to comply with the tax laws.
-
Suspicion that the financial
benefits of a criminal
activity are concealed or
the criminal activity is
continuing.
- An offer
will not be rejected for public
policy grounds solely because:
- It
would generate considerable
public interest, some of it
critical.
- A
taxpayer was criminally
prosecuted for tax or
non-tax violation.
- The
rejection narrative should discuss
the specific public policy issues.
- Rejections
of this type require the approval of
the SB/SE Compliance Area Director
in the field or SB/SE Compliance
Services Field Director for COIC.
5.8.7.6.2
(11-15-2004)
Closing an Offer as a Rejection
- The
following actions should be taken to
close an offer as a rejection:
-
Update the balance for all
modules on the MFT screen by
pressing "I" . Enter the
proposed disposition code
"2" .
-
Generate the AOIC Rejection
Letter using the appropriate
optional paragraph(s) for
the signature of the
authorized delegated
official. Attach the IET and
AET (or the "Screen for
Obvious Full Pay" Worksheet)
to the letter when based on
Doubt as to Collectibility
(DATC).
-
Generate the Power of
Attorney (POA) letter when
there is an authorized
representative.
-
Generate the Form 1271 for
signature of the appropriate
delegated officials. The
Reviewer on Form 1271 must
be the Independent
Administrative Reviewer
(IAR).
-
Document the history
regarding the decision.
Include the following:
1. Amount of the reasonable
collection potential (RCP).
2. Attempts to negotiate an
alternate resolution.
3. Key issues in the
disagreement.
4. Discussion of any special
circumstances noted.
-
Print the history and
include it in the offer
file.
-
Prepare a supplemental
memorandum to report any
rare facts of a confidential
nature that should not be
disclosed through a Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA)
request and include it in
the file clearly identifying
it as " Confidential
Information - Not to be
Disclosed" .
-
Place Tabs (Document 9600B)
in the case file for ease in
review or if the decision is
appealed.
-
Submit the package for
approval and signature of
the Form 1271.
-
After approval route the
file to the Independent
Administrative Reviewer
(IAR).
-
After approval of the
Independent Administrative
Reviewer (IAR), route the
offer for signature, dating
and mailing of the
letter(s).
-
Assign the case on AOIC to
the designated "30 day hold"
assignment number and route
the case file to the hold
file for monitoring of the
appeal period.
5.8.7.6.3
(11-15-2004)
Rejection Not Appealed
- The
rejected offer must be suspended for
30 calendar days to allow the
taxpayer an opportunity to request
an appeal regardless of whether the
taxpayer advises the Service that no
appeal is desired. These cases
should be monitored for receipt of a
request for appeal. The timeframe
allowed by law for requesting an
appeal is 30 calendar days from the
date of the rejection letter. If a
letter requesting appeal is
postmarked on or before the 30th day
it is timely. This date may NOT be
extended for any reason.
- Rejected
offers should be held in the
suspense file for 15 calendar days
past the 30 day deadline to allow
time for an appeal request to be
received and associated with the
offer file. The request must be
postmarked on or before the 30th day
to be timely.
- If no
appeal request is received by the
45th day after the date of the
rejection letter the following
actions should be taken:
-
Remove any tax periods
listed on the MFT screen
that are NOT listed on the
Form 656. This reverses the
Transaction Code (TC) 480 on
these periods and helps to
ensure that inaccurate CSEDs
for such periods are not
reflected.
-
Close the offer record as a
rejection with no appeal on
AOIC.
- If
warranted, take action to
return the accounts to the
Field Compliance function
for immediate resumption of
collection activities.
-
Route the offer file to the
closed files.
Note:
This
step is not required if the
offer was submitted on the 2004
revision of Form 656 that
includes provision "q" , which
states that all liabilities
assessed against the taxpayer
are covered by the offer
5.8.7.6.4
(11-15-2004)
Rejection Appealed
- If a
request for an appeal is received
that is postmarked no later than the
30th day following the date of the
rejection letter, the case must be
forwarded to Appeals function for
consideration.
- The
taxpayer is requested to provide
specific information with the appeal
letter, including a list of items of
disagreement and evidence to support
any of those items. If the letter
provides new information not
previously considered, the case
should be reassigned to an Offer
Examiner or Offer Specialist for
reconsideration.
Note:
Caution
must be exercised when reviewing
a case where new information was
received and considered
following issuance of a
rejection letter. If the
taxpayer's letter requested an
appeal, the offer must still be
forwarded to the Appeals
function if this reconsideration
results in no change to the
initial decision to reject. No
new rejection letter should be
sent.
- The
taxpayer is entitled to Appeals
consideration even if items of
disagreement are not provided or
argued. If it can reasonably be
determined that the letter is a
request for an appeal, the taxpayer
should be afforded that right.
- If an
appeal is received that includes
additional information to reconsider
but it does not change the rejection
determination:
-
Attempt to reach the
taxpayer by phone to advise
the taxpayer that we have
received and considered the
information provided,
however the conclusion did
not change, so the offer
will be forwarded to Appeals
for consideration as
requested.
-
Document any rebuttal to
arguments the taxpayer
raised in the rejection
letter. Print the additional
case history and include it
in the offer file.
-
Transfer the case to 90XX on
AOIC
-
Mail the case to the
appropriate Appeals Area
office based on the
taxpayer's zip code.
- If Appeals
sustains the rejection determination
or the taxpayer withdraws the offer
in Appeals:
-
Remove any tax periods
listed on the MFT screen
that are NOT listed on the
Form 656. This reverses the
Transaction Code (TC) 480 on
these periods and helps to
ensure that inaccurate CSEDs
for such periods are not
reflected.
-
Close the offer record on
AOIC as
• Closing code " 9" if
withdrawn in Appeals.
• Closing code "3 " if
Appeals sustained the
rejection.
- If
warranted, take action to
return the offer to the
Field Compliance function
for immediate resumption of
collection activities.
-
Route the offer file to the
closed files.
Note:
This
step is not required if the
offer was submitted on the 2004
revision of Form 656 that
includes provision "q" , which
states that all liabilities
assessed against the taxpayer
are covered by the offer
5.8.7.7
(11-15-2004)
Authorization to Apply Deposit
- When a deposit
is made with an offer, Service employees
should ask taxpayers if they wish to
have the funds applied to the delinquent
tax debt whenever a withdrawal is
solicited or when advising taxpayers
that acceptance cannot be recommended.
- If a taxpayer
agrees to the application of the
deposit, a written authorization or Form
3040, Authorization to Apply Offer in
Compromise Deposit to Liability, should
be completed, signed and submitted to
the MOIC unit when the case is closed.
Note:
When
closing the AOIC record input "A" in
the pop up screen to alert MOIC that
the funds are to be applied and
immediately mail the written
authorization to that unit. The
Accounting Branch requires written
authorization from the taxpayer
before the funds can be applied to
any tax period.
- If a taxpayer
does not authorize application of the
deposit it will be refunded.
- .
- Occasionally
requests for a discharge or
subordination are received while an
offer is pending. See IRM 5.8.10 for
instructions on processing the Form 3040
received in conjunction with issuance of
the lien certificates.
5.8.7.8
(11-15-2004)
Alternative Resolutions
- Whenever an
offer cannot be recommended for
acceptance Offer Specialists should
discuss alternative resolutions with the
taxpayer. All actions necessary to
complete the agreed resolution should be
taken prior to closing the case.
Note:
In cases
where the taxpayer does not agree
with the proposed alternative
resolution, such as an installment
agreement, refer the case to the
appropriate Collection function for
the next appropriate action.
- Alternative
resolutions that may be appropriate
include:
-
Negotiating and processing the
Form 433-D, Installment
Agreement, to fully pay the tax
due.
-
Preparing the Form 53 to report
the account uncollectible when
requesting current payment would
create an undue hardship, the
taxpayer is deceased and there
is no probate, or is now unable
to locate.
-
Preparing and processing the
Form 3870, Request for
Adjustment, when a reasonable
cause abatement or other
adjustment to a liability should
be made.
-
Assigning the case to the
Automated Collection Function (ACS)
or a Field Compliance Revenue
Officer (RO) when prompt
enforcement action is warranted.
- The above
actions cannot be processed on IDRS
until the TC 48X posts from AOIC. If the
OIC group is able to input actions to
IDRS, the actions should be suspended in
the group until the offer closing
transactions post. If the actions are to
be processed by another Service
function, the request should be mailed
immediately to that office with a cover
memo explaining the TC 48X transactions
have been initiated and the requested
actions should be processed once the
offer closing transactions post.
- The
appropriate IRM Part V Chapter should be
followed to process an installment
agreement, report an account
uncollectible or process a request for
adjustment.
- To assign a
case to ACS or an RO follow locally
established guidelines.
5.8.7.9
(11-15-2004)
Closed File Retention
- Closed cases
(other than acceptances) are to be
retained in closed files in Area or COIC
offices. IRM 1.15.2.21-1 Records Control
Schedule for the Service Wide Collection
Function, directs that the Area and COIC
offices may retire the closed files to
the Federal Records Center when it is
determined they are no longer needed for
current business.
- As space
dictates in the offices, the files
should be prepared to be retired to the
Federal Record Center. Instructions for
shipping files should be secured from
the appropriate AWSS area Records
Manager. A record of the cases shipped,
including taxpayer's name, TIN, and year
closed, with a cross reference to the
FRC box number and location, should be
maintained in the Area or COIC office so
the closed case file can be retrieved if
necessary for litigation or other
necessary action.
- Prior to
shipping these cases they should be
purged so that only the following
documents are shipped:
|
|
|
|
|