|
 |
|
>>>Doubt as to
Liability Offers <<< |
Abate Tax is not a Law Firm |
5.8.21
Doubt as to Liability Offers
5.8.21.1 (01-01-2000)
Overview
- This section provides
guidance for examiners in considering doubt as to
liability OIC requests.
5.8.21.2 (02-01-2004)
Considering the Liability Issue
- Doubt as to liability
exists where there is a genuine dispute as to the
existence or amount of the correct tax liability
under the law. Doubt as to liability does not exist
where the liability has been established by a final
court decision or judgment concerning the existence
or amount of the tax liability.
- Before a doubt as to
liability offer can be accepted, there must be some
doubt as to the correctness of the liability.
Validity of the offer is determined by evaluating
the supporting evidence and circumstances. The
taxpayer is required to submit documentation and/or
other evidence to support his/her doubt as to
liability claim. The evidence available for both
parties must be weighed in order to determine the
extent of any "doubt" .
Note:
Because the role of
Compliance Examination is generally to make
determinations of the
correct tax liability, acceptance
of such offers in compromise by Compliance
Examination should be uncommon. (See Section
5.8.21.5(2) below.) The extent of any
determination of "doubt" should be in keeping
with Policy Statement P–4–117, Examination
Authority to Resolve Issues.
- A doubt as to liability
offer may not be rejected solely because the Service
is unable to locate the taxpayer's return or return
information. The taxpayer cannot be required to
submit a financial statement for a doubt as to
liability offer.
5.8.21.3 (02-01-2004)
Jurisdiction—Doubt as to Liability
- Compliance Examination has
jurisdiction over offers based on doubt as to
liability, including preparation of the necessary
documents and letters to effect their disposition.
- Compliance Collection has
jurisdiction of doubt as to liability offers
involving the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty and
Personal Liability for Excise Tax (IRC Section
4103). Liability offers concerning assessments made
during bankruptcy proceedings may also fall under
the jurisdiction of Compliance Collection (i.e.
inappropriate assessment because automatic stay was
in place, and whether liability was discharged in
bankruptcy). Penalty offers may be considered by
either the Compliance Centers or Compliance Field:
Collection or Examination. (See Section 5.8.20.2(4)
of this handbook.)
5.8.21.4 (01-01-2000)
Examination Considerations
- An offer in compromise is
normally filed by taxpayers in an effort to stop
collection proceedings while Examination reconsiders
a tax assessment. The examination should be
conducted in a manner similar to an audit
reconsideration.
- The offer should be
examined and additional documents requested from the
taxpayer, if necessary. All conclusions should be
documented and all arguments raised by the taxpayer
addressed in the workpapers. Form 4318 is used to
summarize the workpapers.
- Taxpayer contact should
generally be made within 30 days. Offers in process
over 6 months are considered overaged.
- When considering a
compromise based on substitute for return (SFR)
assessments, the return must be reviewed to
determine if all the taxpayer's income was included
in the assessment. If the offer investigation
reveals additional income not included in the SFR
assessment, the taxpayer will be required to file an
amended return to include the income (and the
amended return considered with the offer in
compromise).
5.8.21.5 (01-01-2000)
Determination of Liability
- If the taxpayer's
liability changes as a result of the examination
determination, a re-examination report (i.e. Form
4549) is prepared. The line for taxable income per
return or previously adjusted should be the
corrected taxable income from the previous report.
This should be verified from a transcript of
account.
- If the re-examination
report is based on settlement of the liability
(based on, degree of doubt), offer acceptance
procedures should be followed. If it is based on
determination of the
correct tax liability, offer withdrawal
procedures should be followed and the excess tax
liability abated.
5.8.21.6 (02-01-2004)
Offer Accepted
- Whether the amount offered
by the taxpayer is adequate for a compromise based
on doubt as to liability will depend on the degree
of doubt established. See Section 5.8.21.4 above for
further explanation.
- Acceptance of an offer
requires special processing procedures outlined in
IRM 5.8.8.
- IRM 1.2.2, Delegation
Order Handbook, Delegation Order 11, or its
successor, delineates approval authority for Offers
in Compromise. In general, the Territory Manager is
the approving official for Examination OICs. A legal
sufficiency opinion by Counsel is required for all
offers with total liability amounts of $50,000 or
more.
- Form 7249, Offer
Acceptance Report, is completed for accepted offers.
- If the OIC is accepted,
full payment of the amount offered is expected as a
condition of acceptance.
- If the taxpayer is unable
to pay the amount offered, it should have also been
submitted as a doubt as to collectibility offer
(combination offer) and considered initially by
Collection. The deferred payment option may be
considered for doubt as to collectibility offers but
not doubt as to liability offers alone.
- The completed case is
routed (via Form 3198, Special Handling
Instructions) to the attention of the Offer in
Compromise Coordinator. The Coordinator will review
the case, secure approval from the Technical
Services Examination Group Manager and the Field
Territory Manager, issue the acceptance letter
[Pattern Letter 673(P)], and prepare and process the
appropriate abatement (Form 3870). [See Exhibit
5.8.21–1.]
5.8.21.7 (02-01-2004)
Offer Withdrawn
- Where the examiner and
taxpayer can reach an agreement on the
correct tax
liability, a "compromise" is not required. In order
to process the case as agreed it is necessary for
the taxpayer to withdraw the offer.
- Any adjustments required
to correct the outstanding tax liability are
accomplished through abatement of the erroneously
assessed tax. The following procedures are completed
by the examiner:
- Prepare an audit
report, but do not issue the report to the
taxpayer. The report must start with tax as
previously determined. Verify this from a
transcript of account. Explain the
recommendation to the taxpayer, with the
caveat that it is subject to review.
- Request that the
taxpayer withdraw the offer by submitting a
letter (statement). An example:
- The taxpayer's
signature is always required on the letter
of withdrawal. If the offer was filed
jointly, signatures of both spouses are
required. The taxpayer's representative (per
the power of attorney) may authorize
withdrawal of the OIC on the taxpayer's
behalf.
- Prepare Form 1271,
Rejection or Withdrawal Memorandum. Check
box indicating offer withdrawn. Do not
complete "date of rejection/ withdrawal
letter" at the top of the form. A Form 1271
attachment (Form 886–A), is prepared with an
analysis of each Summary, Facts as to
Liability, and Conclusion.
- Inform the
taxpayer that when the offer is withdrawn,
this action forfeits any appeal rights and
also resumes the running of the statutory
period for collection.
- The completed case
is routed (via Form 3198, Special Handling
Instructions) to the attention of the Offer
in Compromise Coordinator. The Coordinator
will secure approval from the Technical
Services Examination Group Manager or the
Field Territory Manager, prepare and process
the appropriate abatement, and issue the
withdrawal letter [Pattern Letter 241(P)] to
the taxpayer. [See Exhibit 5.8.21–2.]
"I hereby withdraw
my offer for the tax year (insert year(s)),
contingent upon acceptance and processing of
a reduction of ($ amount) in previously
assessed tax and penalties, respectively,
plus interest" .
"I authorize you to apply the ($ if
applicable) deposited with the offer against
any outstanding account " (or) "and request
that the amount of ($ amount) deposited with
the offer be refunded to me" .
In another example, in the case where there
is no adjustment to the tax liability and
the taxpayer agrees, the letter would state:
"I have been advised that my offer cannot be
recommended for acceptance, so I withdraw
the offer" (and complete deposit statement a
indicated above).
The written statement provided to the
examiner should generally be an original,
and not a copy or facsimile.
5.8.21.8 (02-01-2004)
Offer Rejected
- If the taxpayer does not
agree with the examiner's conclusions and will not
or does not withdraw the offer, the following
procedures are completed by the examiner:
- Prepare a report
to reflect any decrease in tax and penalties
(based on the
correct tax liability determined
by the examiner). Do not issue the report to
the taxpayer or solicit a signature. A
report is not required if no abatement of
tax is recommended. If requested, explain
the recommendation to the taxpayer with the
caveat that it is subject to review. See
Section 5.8.25.2 of this handbook regarding
refund or application of a deposit.
- Prepare Form 1271,
Rejection or Withdrawal Memorandum. Check
box indicting rejection. Do not fill in date
of rejection letter at the top of the form.
Prepare a Form 1271 attachment (Form 886–A),
with an analysis of each Summary, Facts as
to Liability, and Conclusion.
- File is routed (via Form
3198, Special Handling Instructions) to the Offer in
Compromise Coordinator for Independent
Administrative Review. See procedures for
Independent Administrative Review (IAR) and case
closing below. After IAR is completed, the OIC
Coordinator will secure approval from the Technical
Services Examination Group Manager or Field
Territory Manager before the rejection letter
[Pattern Letter 238(P)] is issued to the taxpayer.
[See Exhibit 5.8.21–3.]
- If the taxpayer does not
agree with the examiner's conclusions, the case is
processed as a rejection and any partial abatement
(in arriving at the correct tax) is made before the
file is forwarded for final processing.
- The taxpayer has 30 days
from the date of the rejection letter to file an
appeal request. If the taxpayer requests an appeal,
the file will be forwarded to the Office of Appeals.
Exhibit 5.8.21-1 (01-01-2000)
Pattern Letter 673(P)
Exhibit 5.8.21-2 (01-01-2000)
Pattern Letter 241(P)
Exhibit 5.8.21-3 (01-01-2000)
Pattern Letter 238(P)
|
|
|
|